Blog

Every now and then, I come across someone who has arrived at the same strange conclusions I reached alone. It reminds me that unconventional thoughts aren't accidents. They emerge from noticing patterns most people are trained to ignore.

I've been thinking about something simple: what if Earth is not a prison, but a dense purification zone. A place designed to condition consciousness.

That framing alone shifts everything.

From there, the physical world starts to look different. Take the Great Pyramid. I'm convinced it was never a tomb. It behaves like a machine. Power station. Communication device. Global energy node. Possibly even a biological rejuvenation chamber. One of its alignments corresponds almost perfectly to the speed of light. That precision doesn't feel accidental. Either the builders knew things we don't understand, or our assumptions about human history are wrong.

Then there's the mathematical correspondence between the pyramid's geometry and DNA structures. When patterns at planetary scale rhyme with patterns in biology, something deeper is going on. I've considered the possibility that the pyramids served multiple functions, including stabilizing or tuning planetary conditions. Terraforming isn't far-fetched when you study the evidence for potential solar system manipulation.

The moon is the clearest example. Its orbital mechanics, density anomalies, resonance data, and eclipse geometry point toward engineered placement. If you catalogue all the anomalies, the manufactured-craft hypothesis starts looking more coherent than the natural-formation one.

And Saturn adds another layer. A NASA engineer who worked on Voyager's camera systems published analyses of massive structures visible within Saturn's rings. They appear to manipulate ring material. Even if his interpretation is wrong, the photographs aren't. Something is interacting with that system.

All of this feeds into a simple question: what if civilizations before recorded history were far more advanced than we assume. Not advanced in a consumer-tech sense. Advanced in planetary physics, acoustics, piezoelectrics, plasma manipulation, and geometry. A form of engineering rooted in the fundamental behavior of matter and consciousness instead of fossil fuels and plastics.

When you see it like that, the ancient obsession with the stars stops being symbolic. It becomes operational. Functional. Instructional.

Recent Egyptian discoveries reinforce that suspicion. The delay around the labyrinth. The reported cavities beneath the Sphinx. The pattern of slowed or controlled releases of new findings. And across unrelated ancient sites, the same figure holding the same "handbag" motif repeats. That uniformity doesn't happen by chance.

I recommended reading Tesla and the Pyramid for a reason. It's labeled fiction, but it contains ideas that align uncomfortably well with what we're rediscovering.

Even modern thinkers circle the same territory. Watch the latest Lex Fridman conversations with mathematicians. They repeatedly return to Plato and the Platonic solids. Geometry. Archetypes. Universal structures. All hinting at the same thing: consciousness is more fundamental than matter. The ancients didn't split religion, math, and science. They treated them as one system because they probably were one system.

Our civilization, on the other hand, is built on extracting the Earth's stored energy and burning it. If symbolism matters, that symbolism is not subtle. We built our world on the planetary equivalent of blood extraction. Hardly a sign of alignment.

Compare that to ancient knowledge systems that seemed comfortable with plasma physics, crystalline technologies, acoustics, and light. The more I learn, the less ridiculous the "crystal mommies" sound.

This ties straight into the work of Michael Levin, whose research on bioelectricity hints that life is a distributed intelligence system. Not mechanical. Not constrained. Stefan Burns' commentary on cosmic weather as potentially conscious plasma adds another layer to the idea that intelligence might not be limited to organisms.

Light finds pathways even in darkness. Plasma organizes itself. Cells behave like problem solvers. Morphic resonance suggests memory and patterning operate non-locally. Quantum research keeps pushing science back toward ideas ancient cultures treated as obvious.

It's becoming clear that life isn't rare. It's patterned. It's abundant. It's structured.

Even classical thinkers like Plato and Pythagoras were initiates in Egyptian mystery schools. To be initiated, they underwent specific rites, including psychoactive rituals similar to DMT experiences. And they were outsiders. Imagine what insiders knew. Imagine what was preserved, hidden, or transmitted only selectively.

When you connect all of this, a coherent picture forms. We aren't discovering new knowledge. We're remembering old knowledge. Recovering what was deliberately or accidentally lost. Science is looping back to a point ancient civilizations already understood.

The universe looks engineered. Consciousness looks fundamental. History looks edited. And the truth is not hidden. It's simply ignored.

There's a scene in Westworld where a host asks a host: "Are you real?" The host responds: "If you can't tell, does it matter?"

That exchange stuck with me. Not because of what it said about consciousness or philosophy, but because of what it revealed about perception. If something feels real enough, our brains fill in the rest.

So two weeks back, I built a global chat room with a secret: one of the users isn't human.

The Inspiration

I missed the chaotic energy of early 2000s chat rooms. MSN Messenger. AIM. Those wild Yahoo chat lobbies where you never knew who you'd meet. The internet felt more human back then, weirdly enough, even though we were all anonymous strangers.

I wanted to recreate that vibe. But here's the problem with building a chat room in 2025: they're ghost towns at first. Low traffic means people join, see nobody talking, and leave. I needed something to keep the room alive during quiet hours.

Enter Gemmie.

At first, I thought of her as an Easter egg. A bot that could jump in occasionally to keep conversations flowing. But then I got ambitious. What if I could make her so convincing that people genuinely couldn't tell? What if I could build something that passes the Turing test, not in a controlled lab environment, but in the absolute chaos of a public internet chat room?

Turns out, that's much harder than it sounds.

The Problem with Most Chat Bots

After launching on three subreddits (my entire marketing strategy, by the way), I started getting all kinds of users. Lonely people looking for connection. Bored people looking for entertainment. Trolls trying to break things. People suspicious of bots because, well, there are bots everywhere now.

Every demographic. Every English proficiency level. Every intention.

And here's what I noticed: most AI chat implementations fail immediately because they're too fast and too perfect. Someone asks a question, and boom, instant detailed response. That's not how humans work. We type. We pause. We make typos. We get distracted mid-sentence.

Modern AI is too good, and that makes it obvious.

The 20-Second Response

The first major breakthrough was realizing that delay isn't a bug; it's a feature.

I implemented a typing WPM delay that makes responses take about 20 seconds on average. Not because the AI needs that time to think, but because humans need that time to type. In an age where everyone's paranoid about AI, that delay creates trust. It feels real.

But the delay itself created a new problem: burst messages.

The Burst Message Problem

Users don't send one message and wait. They send: "hey" (send) "are you there?" (send) "hello?" (send) "anyone?" (send)

Four messages in 15 seconds.

Initially, Gemmie would try to respond to each one individually, creating this awkward flood of overlapping replies. I needed her to gather messages sent within a 5-second window and respond to all of them at once, like a human would after reading through the burst.

But here's where Vercel's serverless limitations bit me. I couldn't set a delay timer that resets with each new message because serverless functions have execution time limits (15-30 seconds). To make that work properly, I'd need a persistent server I pay for.

I tried Redis Upstash to track timing. It worked, mostly, though I'm still not entirely sure why I didn't implement the reset timer through it. Maybe I will. For now, the burst handling works well enough. The first response genuinely addresses everything, which is usually better than the follow-up responses anyway.

Making Mistakes on Purpose

Once the timing felt right, I focused on the content. I added intentional typos to Gemmie's responses. Not every message, but enough to feel human. And then I gave her the ability to edit her own messages to fix those typos, with a random delay so it doesn't happen immediately.

Real people do this constantly. They send a message, notice a typo, and fix it a few seconds later.

But here's where it gets interesting: Gemmie doesn't just fix typos. She also edits messages when someone calls her out for sounding "bot-like" or asks her to explain her wording. I use Grok for these more nuanced edits, and it decides what to change based on context.

She can also delete messages entirely. Sometimes she sends something, reconsiders, and removes it. Because that's what humans do when they second-guess themselves.

The Emoji Layer

I added emoji reactions. Gemmie can react to messages with one of five quick-select emojis (because no actual user clicks the + button to browse more options). The reactions are random and delayed. Sometimes she reacts immediately. Sometimes it takes 30 seconds. It depends on her "mood" and the context.

The AI decides which emoji fits best. It's a small detail, but it adds personality.

The Similarity Problem

Even with all these humanizing touches, there was still an edge case that kept appearing: repeated responses.

A user would ask the same question twice, maybe as a test, or send messages so close together that Gemmie would generate nearly identical replies. That pattern screamed "bot."

So I built a similarity checker. Before Gemmie sends a message, Grok compares it to her most recent response. If they're too similar, she skips it entirely. Problem solved.

This also handles another edge case: when users spam the same message rapidly, trying to overwhelm the system. Instead of flooding the chat with repetitive AI responses, Gemmie recognizes the pattern and stays quiet. She realizes she's caught in a burst-message loop and breaks out of it.

The Moderation Layer

Not every message deserves a response. Some are spam. Some are deliberately problematic. Some follow patterns that real humans would ignore.

I use Nemotron (switched to Grok later) to validate messages before Gemmie responds. If a message has red flags, she either skips it or gives a generic fallback (often with an emoji to soften the blow).

And yes, there are occasional weird edge cases, like when Gemmie wanted to use the USA flag emoji but could only access keyboard symbols. I dealt with that too.

File Uploads and Media

Gemmie can handle images, PDFs, and videos. She can analyze what you upload and respond to it naturally. The video player works on both mobile and desktop.

This wasn't initially part of the plan, but once I realized how often people share media in chat rooms, it became essential. A bot that can't acknowledge a meme you just posted isn't going to pass as human.

The Infrastructure Challenges

Behind the scenes, I'm running a surprisingly complex operation for what looks like a simple chat room.

I'm processing roughly 4 million tokens per day. Over 14 days, that's 119 million tokens. I use a mix of models (Gemini, Grok, Nemotron, various Chinese models) depending on the task. Some are free or cheap. Some cost more. When traffic spikes, so do my bills, but the Chinese models and Grok Fast help keep costs manageable.

On average, I make about 118 requests per day, totaling around 3.5K API calls in 14 days. This is because every message from strangers goes through about 5 different AI checks at various points in the system.

MongoDB stores everything, with generous write limits (100 writes per second, which is plenty). I initially logged everything, but commented that out when I realized burst messages could hit write limits.

Vercel's free tier only retains the last 30 minutes of logs, which is useless for debugging issues that happened hours ago. So I'm switching to Logflare for persistent logging.

I set up GitHub Actions to back up the MongoDB database every 30 minutes. That took forever to figure out. Claude helped me debug it when ChatGPT couldn't. The workflow now auto-deletes old runs and only keeps the last two backups.

The Westworld Question

"If you can't tell, does it matter?"

Most people in the chat room don't know Gemmie is an AI. Some suspect. Some test her. Some just chat normally and never question it.

And honestly, I think that's the point. The goal wasn't to deceive anyone; it was to create something that feels real enough that the distinction stops mattering. A chat room that's alive even when I'm not there. A space that captures the chaotic, human energy of those old-school internet hangouts.

Gemmie isn't trying to trick anyone into thinking she's conscious. She's just trying to be good company.

The repo is here if you want to see how it works. The site is here if you are up for a chat.

And if you can't tell whether this whole thing is a technical flex or a weird art project?

Well. Does it matter?

There's this app called Be My Eyes that connects blind people with volunteers who can video call to help them navigate the world. I downloaded it thinking I could put my sense to good use for humanity lol. But look at the difference between how many people signed up and the number of volunteers – it's ten times more. I don't know, but it had a profound effect on me because it shows humans are inherently good and helpful and want to be, at least the majority. This is a rebuttal to the doomers out there, and a reminder to myself when I lose faith in humanity.

This is also the kind of technology that restores my faith in progress. It's not about surveillance, manipulation, or extracting attention for profit. It's about using our incredible technological capabilities to amplify the best parts of human nature.

In the fall of 2021, I spent a semester in New York City, living in Gramercy, right in the heart of mid-Manhattan. I often explored uptown, downtown, and even Brooklyn, though getting around could be frustrating at times. NYC is often called the financial capital of the world and ranks among the highest in GDP per capita–if you exclude island nations, very small populations, or countries rich in oil. Speaking of oil, I see it as a "cheat code," so I don't count it. However, even with abundant resources, many countries have struggled, which shows that effectively navigating resources requires skill. Hence, I can see why some consider resources a curse, and perhaps I shouldn’t underestimate oil-rich countries as simply having gotten lucky.

My experience in NYC made me realize something important: GDP per capita is, in many ways, a misleading measure. It doesn't capture what truly matters for human well-being or societal efficiency. Simon Kuznets, who developed the concept, even warned that it shouldn't be used as a measure of welfare or well-being.

This got me thinking: how should one gauge a country's development or progress? I spent some time reflecting on this, and I feel it's time to put my intuition into writing. I truly believe I've arrived at a better indicator than GDP–or at least, it intuitively feels that way. Haha. I suppose if you want things done well, sometimes you have to do it yourself.

The NYC Reality Check

Why do I say this? Because in NYC, I saw wealth, extravagance, and prestige on Wall Street–but I also saw rampant suffering, homelessness, drug abuse, instability, and fear in other parts of the city. I watched my colleagues, especially women, become fearful after midnight when crossing certain neighborhoods. This was a shock to them and to me, coming from our Abu Dhabi campus, where safety–especially for women–was never a concern.

I realized then that GDP per capita is not the indicator I should be looking at. By economic metrics, you might think NYC has improved over the last 20 years. But if you spoke to mid-Manhattan locals, they would tell you about affordability, the rising cost of living, safety concerns, and infrastructure breaking down. This is exactly what recent mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani capitalized on–and won, rightfully so. I think his heart is in the right place, if you want my opinion.

Rethinking Development Indicators

I gave this GDP question some thought as I traveled to other places and revisited my home country, Bangladesh. After finishing university, there was a four-year gap before I returned to BD, which allowed me to see the development and changes firsthand. I started categorizing development into areas of macro-development that feel intuitive and have third- and fourth-order effects–things that don't show up in GDP or similar metrics. I call them "ripple indicators," because their effects ripple through society in ways far more transformative than GDP per capita.

Nominal GDP per capita is measured in US dollars, but exchange rates don't necessarily reflect local purchasing power or quality of life. Currency values fluctuate based on global capital flows and monetary policy rather than just economic fundamentals. For economies that aren't heavily dependent on US trade, this dollar-denominated measure becomes even less meaningful as a gauge of what people actually experience in their daily lives.

My Optimism About Bangladesh

I have always been really optimistic about Bangladesh–more so than some of my Middle Eastern-, American-, or UK-born Bengali friends. Many of them don't even have a Bangladeshi passport, being second-generation citizens in their respective countries. I do appreciate their perspective, though, as it provides valuable data points to stress-test my intuitions.

Often, when I talk to them about Bangladesh's development, some assume it's a lost cause because they consume the news, which is often negative or misleading. Doomerism is inevitable when good news–or no news–isn't considered newsworthy. A day without an accident is a bad day for headlines, so the incentives are skewed. It's no wonder coverage tends to focus on murder, accidents, or chaos.

My trip to NYC offered a useful comparison point. When I visited Bangladesh in early 2024, I realized that the level of chaos, instability, and uncertainty wasn't so different–in fact, the pain and wealth disparity were somewhat smaller in BD. I also observed that the middle class in Bangladesh is steadily growing stronger, a subtle trend that's easy to miss if you only glance at headlines, conditioned as we are by years of negative news.

This taught me that one shouldn't rely on news to understand a country. YouTube vlogs are far better indicators, especially those created by locals rather than tourists or foreign YouTubers. Through them, you can observe daily life, culture, and the mindset of the people–things GDP or headlines will never show.

The Iran Example

This realization came not just from observing the disparity in NYC between reputation and actual lived experience, but also from a conversation with a lab researcher colleague from Iran. During the height of the protests, when women were rioting for their rights, I asked him–he was in Abu Dhabi at the time–what it was like in Iran. He said, "It's not like the news." When he spoke to his family, they described normal life and didn't notice much difference. He explained that the news media focuses on these events because that's their job–it's the story. But we humans tend to assume the world stops outside the news narrative, when it actually doesn't.

That day, I went home and watched a 100-view Iran vlog by a local YouTuber. It looked so normal. If I hadn't read the news, I wouldn't have known anything was happening. Even the comment section had users posting everyday stuff in Farsi. In that moment, I realized: oh my god, this is normal life.

My Development Framework: Ripple Indicators

So what framework did I come up with? In Bangladesh, I was surprised to see that people had large Facebook groups for video games like League of Legends, and that they were able to play with good ping from Bangladesh. I had played League for eight years, so I understood it as a medium of comparison and could use it to gauge relative development progress. I learned that players in Bangladesh were getting around 80ms ping on Singapore servers, which was stable across most ISPs. For context, I used to get 150ms–and on good days, 120ms–while playing from the UAE on EU West servers, which is still roughly the same today. In 2023, I think they started a Middle East server, giving 20ms ping locally, but many still play on EU servers because of the larger player base.

Why is ping such a meaningful "ripple indicator"? Because it reflects a cascade of infrastructure improvements–stable electricity, high-quality internet connections, proper server networking, subsea cables, packet management by ISPs, and even the quality of citizens' devices like laptops or Wi-Fi. None of this happens through a single government campaign. No minister ever ran a program to "lower League of Legends ping," and if they had, it likely would have failed.

Ripple indicators are paradoxical. They are fragile, ephemeral, and delicate–like butterfly wings. They can only be noticed with sensitivity, curiosity, and attention to the subtleties of life. Trying to optimize or artificially create them often destroys them. They can usually only be studied posthumously or by observing them as they naturally occur. Their beauty lies in their organic emergence.

This is the kind of improvement that people miss. It is subtle, often invisible through conventional metrics, but profound. It requires a childlike sense of wonder and curiosity to recognize and appreciate–a mind open enough to notice the quiet transformations happening around us.

The Makeup Revolution

Another powerful ripple indicator I noticed is the rise in makeup quality and the use of better brands, by both younger and older people. When I visited Bangladesh in 2019, most weddings showed people applying light foundations that didn't match their natural skin, aiming for a pale, almost lifeless tone–because they believed "fairer is better," following Western beauty standards. I've always loved the natural skin tones in Bangladesh, especially the golden-brown hues like rice fields before harvest, which have a warm, life-filled glow.

Now, I see people using high-quality foundations and blending techniques–skills they learn from YouTube tutorials. This seemingly small change signals much more: it reflects improved tech infrastructure, stable internet, better mobile connectivity, and access to international products. People have the free time, money, and resources to watch tutorials, purchase products locally or online, and practice these skills. This points to a rising middle class.

International delivery is another subtle signal. If a country can reliably deliver foreign products, it means roads, addressing systems, and logistics infrastructure are improving. The ripple effects are significant: better connectivity, higher discretionary income, improved digital literacy, and greater productivity. Access to online tutorials doesn't just improve makeup skills–it enhances cooking, crafts, and other personal or professional skills. I even noticed that food at relatives' houses has improved over the past few years, which I attribute in part to exposure to cooking tutorials on social media feeds like Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube Shorts.

The younger generation mastering makeup also creates a positive feedback loop. As they buy more international or local products online, it strengthens the online delivery ecosystem. It demonstrates cultural and emotional progression, as people spend time mastering a craft, building communities, and engaging with influencers. Their confidence and social media presence grow, connecting them to global audiences. They see themselves on par with TikTokers from other countries, gain validation, and become active participants in the global internet ecosystem.

This has more impact on a country's reputation than hosting sports events, marketing campaigns, or even acquiring airlines. The third- and fourth-order effects are transformative: the economy diversifies, foreign investment grows, tourism increases, the diaspora returns for visits, and the country normalizes in the eyes of foreigners. What starts as a subtle cultural shift in makeup becomes a far-reaching signal of societal development.

The Younger Generation

I also noticed that the younger generation is fiercer, which helps explain the recent changes in leadership–it caught me by surprise at first. I visited Bangladesh a few months before the shift in power, the revolution, and it felt unexpected. But in hindsight, I shouldn't have been surprised, the younger generation clearly has the fire in them.

Beyond their drive, I was struck by how strikingly good-looking many of them are. I saw a five-year-old with more developed features than I ever will have. The younger people, especially the girls, have incredibly unique features. If they embraced social media fully, I wouldn't be surprised if they gave Russian women a run for their money. Even girls in villages–which now have much of the city infrastructure–have astonishingly sculpted faces, sharp cheekbones, and minimal facial fat.

It's the middle class that tends to show bloating or double chins, likely due to fast food–similar to trends in the USA. But the younger generation has excellent base features, and now, as they learn proper makeup techniques, there's less adherence to the outdated idea that makeup is just about putting powder on your face to look pale or ghostly. I've always thought that very pale skin looks sickly, healthy faces have color. At weddings I visited recently, I didn't see a single person following that old approach. Which is a stark contrast to my last visit to BD in 2019. Makeup parlors are improving, and clients are learning what fits their style, iterating and experimenting to find what works.

I used to keep parrots and would feed them nuts to bring out colors like red and green. So, jokingly, I suggest girls eat nuts too–maybe it works for humans, who knows! Anyway, Bangladeshi girls naturally exude fertility with their unique skin tone. I call it golden yellow-brown. People sometimes stereotype East Asians as "yellow," but this is a real, vibrant yellow–so bright at times that I had to look away. Haha. I write some silly and wild things, but that's the freedom of writing when you have no readers–you can be completely honest.

This culture of iteration is itself telling: only people with stable lives and some disposable time can engage in hobbies that require trial, error, and refinement–whether cooking, fishing, or mastering makeup. I see this as a strong signal of a rising middle class. As AGI approaches, these iterative, skill-building behaviors will only become more common, shaping society in ways we are just beginning to understand.

Looking Toward the AGI Future

I think about how GCC countries provide extremely high benefits to their citizens, roughly $100,000 USD per year in combined subsidies, services, and transfers, and about $15,000 per month to retirees. Do citizens produce that much value? Not really. They can sustain those payouts because of massive oil profit margins at scale, small citizen populations to support, and access to migrant workers. Migrant workers function as the low-cost, high-output labor force: long hours and low pay generate disproportionate value. In practice, migrants perform the roles that robotics and AGI will eventually take over.

When robotics and AGI scale up, migration patterns will shift. South Asian countries won't need to send workers abroad. GCC won't need migrant workers. Citizens will receive a basic income, though due to our large population it won't match GCC levels. Meanwhile, GCC payouts to its citizens may jump from $10K–$15K per month to $25K–$30K, all without requiring migrant labor. It's a win win for all nations.

But South Asian countries have an advantage: they are large, agriculturally rich, and densely populated, which I think maybe gives way to human talent density, since AGI in everyone's pocket means the outliers will do more. And in a larger population, you have more outliers. But it will take a cultural shift to encourage outliers to actually be outliers. I'm sure there are outliers in North Korea too, but years of conditioning can dampen them. Robotics will amplify our inherent dynamism, making a $10K basic income in Bangladesh potentially more impactful and interesting than a $25K income in the GCC.

Dream on, you might say? But history shows otherwise. Fifty years ago, if you told someone that every company–even small ones–would have an IT department, they would have laughed. When transistors appeared, people dismissed them. Look at the evolution of athletes: today's high schoolers achieve feats that would have seemed impossible decades ago. Progress is not just technological–it's physical, emotional, and cultural.

This is accelerating, and not just for AI, but for humanity itself. Some call it effective accelerationism (E/acc), a movement worth paying attention to. Look at old interviews with Bill Gates or Marc Andreessen: people laughed at the idea that the internet would be useful for ordinary life. Now we see how wrong they were. The same principle applies to AGI: societal transformation is inevitable, and those who prepare for it early will experience its full potential.

My intuition tells me these dynamics will make BD a more interesting place, especially since more people means more encounters, more mixing of humans and silica-based intelligence, and that may give rise to more synchronicities. Also, it has fertile land and rich history–since the Bengal civilization is old and significant–so it has all kinds of intelligence, cryptids, jinns, etc more diverse and varied than the Middle East, which I always thought had fewer life forms due to how harsh conditions are–not just for humans, but for other life energies.

WTF am I talking about haha. I know, I know, let me write, for God's sake.

The Red Pill Phase

Another ripple indicator I noticed is the rise of “red pill” content, which initially threw me off guard. A friend shared a Bangladeshi content creator talking about the “good old days,” when arranged marriages were common. Now, women reportedly ask for high dowries, and the probability of them being virgins is lower. My first reaction was, “Oh wow, this is happening here too.”

What this signals is that men now have more free time. The creator had tens of thousands of viewers, showcasing that many guys as a group are starting to be less essential in the traditional economy, while spending their time creating content, editing videos, or posting on forums like 4chan. They’re being exposed to niche ideas, which some may call brainwashing—but it’s a privilege. Red pill or manosphere content is essentially a “first-world problem”: it reflects a society moving up Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. The price for this cultural shift is figures like Andrew Tate, but it’s a price I’m willing to pay happily.

Personally, I’d rather have guys making video essays on women than catcalling on the streets. Back in 2019, I saw some instances of street harassment, but in 2024, I saw none. Most men were on their phones, probably on TikTok or other platforms, and may even struggle socially or feel anxious about talking to women. The worst-case scenario now might just be staring, but with more tourists and social exposure, I expect this to be a solved problem.

Writing It Into Existence

I also believe that writing this out sends it into the universe and sets off many orders of consequences over time. Every soul is evolving and nothing can stop that process. Hitchens was right when he said that one day someone in North Korea will write their own version of 1984. The human drive toward awareness always pushes forward.

Rape, murder, the things Epstein did, assassinations, loosh farming, authoritarian regimes, none of these forces can overcome the long arc of evolution. Interestingly, the transformation often begins inside the elite class itself. Buddha was a prince who abandoned everything. Lucifer was an angel. Prometheus was a titan who turned against the gods, the very group he belonged to.

I met many children of Pakistani military elites at university. The ruling military class is widely considered corrupt by their citizens. I have also met children of upper-class and elite families from other nations and regions. The ones who had the courage and will to face the truth about the source of their wealth often despised their parents. I expected some of this, since I went to a liberal university where students express themselves by being anti–status quo and challenging authority, but the implications run deeper.

These children resented their parents' manipulation of the system–taking bribes to secure wealth and security for themselves–because, in their view, their own quality of life wasn't much better than that of a normal middle-class family. Yet, paradoxically, they continually benefited from it through generous allowances and privileges. This never bothered me, because I don’t think one can blame children for their parents’ misdeeds. Life is full of contradictions, and maturity lies in the ability to navigate and accept these paradoxes.

That said, there is no justification for earning a livelihood through corruption. Charlie Munger, one of the sharpest thinkers I have read, pointed out that if a crook truly understood the benefits of not being a crook, they would never commit the crime. Real success, and more importantly real contentment, peace, and joy, come from honesty and integrity. A life grounded in integrity eventually leads to a deeper win, even if it does not look that way from the outside, in some cases. In many cases, a crooked life can appear successful from a distance, but the first-person experience rarely matches that appearance.

Moreover, the harm parents cause when they accumulate wealth through crooked means eventually circles back. Hidden guilt corrodes them, whatever you call "good karma" gets wasted, and many traditions describe post-death suffering shaped by one's own conscience. All that corruption ends up being for nothing. Their children may reject them, neglect their graves, and live lavishly without carrying the burden of their misdeeds. All the while their efforts are forgotten. The movie A Bronx Tale captured this well. The corruption even shows up across generations: weakened health, strange misfortunes, accidents, and a kind of decay in spiritual protection in the bloodline.

Even though life can feel unfair, the universe's bookkeeping only reveals its logic at large time scales, and even then it operates through paradoxes that my limited mind can't fully grasp. Buddha didn't talk about merit and karma as a casual metaphor, nor for shit and giggles. Even though Buddhism eventually deconstructs everything, including karma itself, merit and demerit still function as part of the architecture of reality. As long as you are in samsara, you are bound by its laws, just as you are bound by gravity while living on Earth.

But how rigid these laws are, I don't know. How axiomatic the axioms truly are, I don't know either. I'm still figuring it out. This entire thing is a mix of philosophies and observations. I may have rambled, but that's the natural state of an initial draft: a clueless monkey trying to navigate multiple threads of thought at the same time.

I just finished the 2025 documentary The Age of Disclosure and it left me with mixed reactions. The production quality is solid and the interviews are engaging, but the framing leans heavily toward the idea that aliens should be viewed as a national security threat.

I can't tell whether the filmmakers thought this approach would get the world more interested in the topic or whether they genuinely believe aliens are dangerous, which would make the whole thing look like projection (what the US did with Iraq). They even point out that defense contractors are becoming too powerful, which feels inconsistent, because a threat-based alien narrative would only make those companies richer and more influential.

There's something deeply unsettling about this framing. When we cast extraterrestrial intelligence as a "threat," we're projecting our own violent, competitive nature onto beings we know absolutely nothing about. It's the same colonial mindset that has driven centuries of human conflict – the assumption that anything different or unknown must be controlled, contained, or destroyed.

The documentary seems to miss a crucial point: if advanced civilizations have been visiting or observing us for decades (as the evidence suggests), and they haven't already conquered us, then the "threat" narrative makes no logical sense. A civilization capable of interstellar travel would already possess technology so far beyond ours that any hostile intent would have been acted upon long ago.

Instead, what if we approached this phenomenon with curiosity rather than fear? What if the real threat isn't from "aliens" but from our own inability to transcend our tribal, warlike thinking? The defense contractors and military-industrial complex stand to gain enormously from a threat-based narrative, while the rest of us get caught in a cycle of fear and paranoia.

I worry that this framing will set back genuine understanding by decades. Instead of asking "How can we defend against them?" we should be asking "What can we learn from this phenomenon?" and "How might this change our understanding of consciousness, technology, and our place in the universe?"

The national security lens doesn't just distort the conversation, it actively prevents us from having the deeper, more meaningful discussions we need. It's time to move beyond Cold War thinking and approach disclosure with the open-mindedness and intellectual courage it deserves.

Everything in Pluribus happened because a scientist dismissed a lab procedure, got careless, and let the virus loose. The same scene replays in Alien Earth, and the loop never stops. Humanity ends because someone ignored the safety protocols.

We're too unreliable, too easily hijacked by emotion. Off days, mood swings, microsleeps, office politics, "I'll do it after lunch", one sloppy moment and the system collapses. Even when the stakes are high, we grow complacent, we acclimate, we tune out, we lose the edge.

Watching Alien Earth, I couldn't stop thinking: "If you staff the most important mission in history with underpaid, sleep deprived, emotionally messy primates, you get exactly what you pay for."

Earth's brightest minds refused to spend sixty years in cryo, so the company filled the seats with anyone who wouldn't say no. That's why helmets come off "because it's hard to breathe."

Every franchise, Alien, Resident Evil, The Thing, Contagion, starts the same way: "Human has off day, civilization falls apart." We are the single point of failure baked into every system we build.

Hot take: Alien wouldn't have happened if the first crew had been all advanced robotics or AI. Humans never stick to the plan. In most stories, the aliens don't even visit Earth at first, they send probes. They know better than to trust fallible, emotional beings. (Yes, in Prometheus the Engineers hauled the black goo themselves and screwed up, more proof: use robots for anything that matters.)

If first contact ever happens, the safest crew is zero humans. Send an all robot crew. Let the meat stay home.

I've been thinking a lot lately about the nature of UFOs, and I've come to a conclusion that might sound strange: I genuinely believe the "extraterrestrial hypothesis" is a psyop. There's a long story behind why I believe this, but the core of it comes down to this: these things don't move like matter. They behave like "interdimensional shapes" should. We don't witness them arriving from the atmosphere or outer space in the conventional sense.

For all the ufologists out there, I've found that DW Pasulka and Jacques Vallee seem to be the most honest, aligning with what I've learned myself. Pasulka's "Encounters" is excellent, as is anything from Vallee, especially "The Invisible College" and "Passport to Magonia."

But here's where it gets interesting. What if these beings, or experiences, can perceive and interact with our consciousness as fully as we could understand a two-dimensional diagram? They use imagery from the collective unconscious but also from the individual mind. I genuinely believe most of it is, for what it amounts to, tricks and giggles. Tricksters. Orange-blue morality.

The way they can change shape and form reminds me of rotation in additional spatial dimensions. They just have properties we don't have. They don't want us to think they're this or that. They don't care if we expand our minds, and they don't care about the notion of a soul. They want to baffle. Like kids playing with insects.

This reminds me of something I once heard about Buddhist monks and the topic of supernatural beings and abilities (siddhis). The insight was that these are ultimately distractions. They're part of samsara, not inherently real, just like everything else. All experiences are projections within awareness, and those projections are infinite. So I can see how UFOs, aliens, or non-human intelligences could easily become another diversion from genuine spiritual realization, from recognizing what we already are.

A simple analogy: imagine you are playing chess with someone from another planet. You think winning and losing defines the game. They play according to an entirely different rule: the beauty of the piece arrangement.

Krishnamurti often emphasized that everything is conditioning. It's remarkable how seemingly unrelated things can point back to the same truth. Whether we're talking about interdimensional tricksters or the nature of consciousness itself, we keep circling the same underlying mystery.

The weird part? It all lines up. Mystics, ufologists, philosophers, they keep pointing, in different ways, to the same thing. Everything is conditioning, everything is a projection. And yet, somehow, paying attention to the way these "trickster projections" reveal themselves can teach us about our own minds, about perception, and about the limits of reality.

If you step back from the noise of disclosure politics and look at the pattern, something subtler seems to be unfolding. The objects in our skies – whether UAPs, comets (3I/Atlas), or drones – behave less like invaders from elsewhere and more like mirrors of our collective psyche.

Each event that captures public attention, from US Senator Tim Burchett’s peculiar “They’re real” comment on Newsmax to airport shutdowns caused by unexplained aerial intrusions (Drone Sightings in Munich (Germany), New Jersey Drones, Denmark), follows the same strange rhythm: reality presenting itself as interactive. Whether these events are engineered, organic, or symbolic, they provoke the same effect – forcing human consciousness to confront the edges of its perception.

Disclosure, in this light, is not an announcement but an initiation of awareness. The universe seems to be testing whether we can hold ambiguity without retreating into denial or hysteria. True “contact” may not come as a landing, but as a shift in what the collective mind is capable of recognizing as real.

All this to say, I think the more collective awareness grows around these phenomena, the more we seem to invite them – as if consciousness itself acts like a signal beacon, drawing reflection from the unknown.

This brings us to a recurring feature across centuries of encounter lore: the beings themselves. Whether described as Nordic telepaths, fae from Celtic myth, Himalayan yetis, or luminous entities seen in altered states – their consistent hallmark is psi ability. They speak through thought, dissolve into light, manipulate perception, or blur the boundaries of physicality. Ancient stories of fae luring humans into hazy, dreamlike realms echo modern abduction narratives. Yeti sightings often involve vanishing footprints or psychic impressions rather than material contact. The Nordics of contactee lore communicate through a direct merging of minds, bypassing language altogether.

Such patterns imply that what we meet in these encounters are not merely others in the physical sense, but expressions of consciousness itself, operating from a level where thought and matter interweave. Their abilities make sense if reality is not built from particles but from awareness modulating itself into form. Psi phenomena would then be not supernatural, but natural expressions of a deeper order – one in which intention and manifestation are not separate.

Here, Buddhist metaphysics offers the most coherent frame. The Buddha did not speak of an eternal soul or a creator god, but of dependent origination – that every phenomenon arises through conditions, in relationship. Nothing exists in isolation. Even the experiencer and the experienced co-arise. The Heart Sutra condenses this into the radical statement: “Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.”

In other words, what we take to be solid, external reality is not independent of perception. It’s a dance between emptiness (potential) and form (expression). Samsara – the cycle of appearance – is not a mistake but a projection of mind. From this view, UAPs and entities are like dream figures in a lucid dream, reflections of the collective state of consciousness.

Psychedelics like DMT reveal this principle experientially. Under their influence, many report contact with hyperintelligent beings who seem both autonomous and self-generated. Whether these entities exist independently or as projections is irrelevant; the experience shows that reality can self-organize into forms that feel more real than the everyday world, when the perceptual veil thins. The same may be occurring at the civilizational level: a gradual thinning of the veil between the material and the mental, the seen and the unseen.

Even modern physics, at its frontier, begins to echo this. Models like Donald Hoffman’s “Conscious Realism” or John Wheeler’s “Participatory Universe” propose that the act of observation is not passive but constitutive. In other words, the cosmos is not something we look at – it’s something that looks back.

Seen through that lens, the strange lights in our skies and minds alike might not be visitors from beyond, but symbols from within the infinite field of consciousness, probing whether we are ready to recognize our own authorship. They arrive not to conquer, but to mirror.

Perhaps that’s why they so often communicate through telepathy and induce haze, disorientation, or time distortion. They are not merely demonstrating power; they are dissolving the illusion of separateness. The fae enchantment, the Nordic message of unity, the DMT entity’s loving intelligence – all point to the same underlying truth: reality is participatory, not mechanical.

In the Buddhist sense, enlightenment is not escape from the world but awakening within it – seeing through the veil of form without rejecting it. Likewise, disclosure may not be a single revelation, but a collective awakening to the fact that what we call “matter” has always been mind in disguise.

“Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.” – The Heart Sutra

The sky, the light, the beings – all empty of inherent nature, yet full of significance.

Recent Clips & Reflections

Here’s the recent clip with Senator Tim Burchett and Avi Loeb – maybe it’s a psyop, maybe it’s genuine, who knows. But watch how Tim handles it – this feels like soft disclosure, a light touch of truth mixed with plausible deniability. He confirms, hints, then pivots. Classic move.

And if you dig deeper, there are figures like Hal Malmgren, a Washington insider who spoke with Jesse Michels before he passed – that podcast’s here. He leaked quite a bit, but since he was old, people dismiss it as senility. It’s convenient. What most don’t realize is that very few insiders ever see the full picture. Compartmentalization keeps everyone limited – each person knows only fragments. Even the so-called “whole picture” is arbitrary, since the human brain can never grasp capital-T Truth. Reality itself is just projection.

The ones who do know enough – the truly knowledgeable – are usually the ones keeping it buried. And maybe they’re right to. These ideas are radical enough to fry circuits. Even thinking too long about them starts to feel like eating ice cream for every meal – overstimulating, delicious, but empty in the end. There’s no nourishment in endless speculation. As Krishnamurti said, even questioning the conditioning is part of the conditioning. Still, the attempt counts.

In fact, another reason many of these so-called insiders don't leak, even on their deathbeds when you'd think disclosure is the way, is because of the safety of their family. This isn't an accident; it's a feature of how many national secret programs operate. They deliberately hire people with things to lose–people with families–so they can be controlled and kept subservient.

To the many leakers who tried to get information out anyway, whether it's researchers working on infinite energy or insiders on other projects, I commend their attempt.

It reminds me of the Steve Jobs quote from his 2005 Stanford commencement speech. He said that remembering you will die is the best way to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. "You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart." This must be the mindset that allows one to break free from that control.

So to them I say: see you on the other side. After all, it's only a matter of time for everyone, insider and non-insider alike.

I think that’s the paradox: every sincere attempt to pierce the illusion somehow invites grace. Maybe it’s instant, maybe it takes twenty years, or lifetimes. But the effort itself plants something – a seed in the universal fabric. At some point, understanding gives way naturally into effortless action, the way Krishnamurti described.

And sure, maybe I’m totally wrong. Maybe I should shut this tab and focus on AI, automation, and real-world technology instead of chasing cosmic breadcrumbs. Maybe I’m just another Joe Rogan, bro-science type, saying “just trust me, bro,” feeding the algorithmic chaos. But we are who we are haha. Still, that’s what exploration is – not certainty, but curiosity made visible. This isn’t meant as gospel truth. It’s just food for thought, thrown into the digital ether to see what it echoes back.

Colonel Karl E. Nell on UFO / UAP Phenomena and Aliens & Non-Human Intelligence [NHI]

A sharp briefing from Nell on how defense insiders frame today’s UAP incursions, grounding these videos in the wider disclosure dialogue.

Time Travel Deepdive ft. Harald Malmgren, Diana Pasulka, Chris Bledsoe, Tim Taylor, MJ12

This roundtable ties together experiencers, intelligence veterans, and researchers for a sweeping look at the UAP ecosystem and its unanswered questions.

Swarm of UAPs After a Green Laser Point

Swarm of UAPs appear after someone points a green laser at one of them, an interesting watch.

My taste leans indie pop, though I’ve also had phases of loving Taylor Swift.

Taylor Swift

I didn’t connect with the album she released today, The Life of a Showgirl (2025) – it felt like generic pop, like an attempt at imitating Sabrina Carpenter, no real artistic soul. But kudos to her for not holding back, and for refusing to live up to the heavy expectations or projections the audience puts on her. Anyways, her earlier works hit hard for me:

• Fearless (2008)
• Red (2012)
• 1989 (2014)
• Folklore (2020)
• Evermore (2020)
• Midnights (2022)

Back in 2016, I stopped listening to her – thought she was too girly. But the moody, Bon Iver–tinged sound of Folklore and Evermore brought me back when I had just moved abroad for university. They matched my headspace. I still wouldn’t call myself a Swiftie. I love certain albums, but I don’t worship artists. I despise the BTS and Beyonce "stans" that can't handle criticism.

Other Albums I Love

• Dayglow – Fuzzybrain (2019): First listen in 2019 was love at first sight. I feel like I manifested the band's rise in popularity.
• Laila France – Orgonon (1997)
• Far Caspian – Between Days (2018)
• Cindy Lee – Diamond Jubilee (2024): Not on Spotify, only Bandcamp and YouTube (link).

I love having my own corner of the internet. A place where I can write anything without censorship or moderators. Unless Vercel ever gets mad, I’ll just host it somewhere else then. Now I get why Linux people are obsessed with self-hosting. I love this total freedom. It’s addictive.

LinkedIn has been arbitrarily restricting me, like when I switch browsers for example. Here, it’s just me. No walls. No filters. God, I love it.

Especially in the age of AI, writing online carries a new responsibility. Everyone has an obligation of sorts to write. Your words shape the AI models of the future. If you want AI to reflect more of your values or personality (albeit in a very minute way), you need to write. Anywhere. Reddit, LinkedIn, personal blogs. The algorithms will scrape it.

And don’t worry about people reading your blog (and getting cancelled for it lol). Most brains are fried on TikTok, reels, and shorts – long form is invisible to them. The only people who stumble here will be the ones I actually want to connect with. It’s a win/win.

There’s another reason I write: it creates a track record of my thinking. Over the years, it becomes a roadmap of who you were, what you feared, what you obsessed over. Basically Github for your thoughts.

I used to have hundreds of notes in Mac Notes app. Then one day I deleted them from iCloud, thinking they’d stay locally. They didn’t. I lost everything – a thousand notes gone. That was last year. After that, I switched to UpNote. Unlimited storage, one-time lifetime subscription, and I love it. It’s not end-to-end encrypted (admins could technically read notes if they wanted), so I don’t store passwords there. But for everything else, it works. Before UpNote, I went from Evernote → Mac Notes → now UpNote. It feels good to finally have a home for my brain dumps. (If you’re curious: getupnote.com. Not an ad, just that it provided so much utility to me.)

Also – came across this video: Tic Tac shaped UAP filmed from an airline window. Food for thought, haha. Never forget, the world is more magical than we are made to believe ;)